Administrators from one of the most influential evangelical colleges in the country removed their names from a controversial letter addressed to Muslim leaders that some say compromises the Christian faith.
Wheaton College president Duane Litfin, provost Stanton Jones and chaplain Stephen Kellough decided to back away from the letter that they had originally endorsed along with nearly 300 Christian leaders in November in response to an October statement (“A Common Word Between Us and You”) from 138 Muslim scholars and clerics who called for interfaith cooperation for world peace.
“I signed the statement because I am committed to the business of peace-making and neighbor-love,” Litfin stated on Friday in The Record, the student publication of Wheaton College. “I did not savor the document’s unnuanced apology section, but swallowed that in order to be a part of reaching out a hand to these Muslim leaders who had courageously taken the initiative. Though the statement was not written in the way I would have written it, it seemed to me that I could sign it without compromising any of my Christian convictions.”
The Christian-endorsed statement – which included such signatories as Rick Warren of Saddleback Church, Billy Hybels of Willow Creek Community Church, and Leith Anderson of the National Association of Evangelicals – urged for interfaith dialogue that would build relations and reshape the Christian and Islam communities. Christian leaders also asked for forgiveness of sins committed against Muslims in the Crusades and excesses of the war on terrors in the letter.
Titled “Loving God and Neighbor Together: A Christian Response to a Common Word Between Us and You,” the statement emphasized the “absolutely central” commonality between both religions: love of God and love of neighbor.
The response drew sharp criticism from highly respected theologians R. Albert Mohler, Jr., president of the Southern Baptist Theological Seminary, and John Piper, pastor at Bethlehem Baptist Church, and other Christian leaders.
Piper called the Christian document a “profound disappointment” in the way it was worded and was surprised that even some of his friends lent their support to the letter.
“What’s missing from this document is a clear statement about what Christianity really is and how we can come together to talk with Muslims from our unique, distinctive, biblical standpoint,” Piper said in a public statement last month.
He rejected the letter’s emphasis on the common ground of the love of God, arguing that the love of God for Christians is starkly different from that of Islam.
“The love of God is … uniquely expressed through Jesus Christ as the propitiation for our sins because he died on the cross and rose again. All those things, Islam radically rejects,” Piper stressed. “So they do not believe in the love of God we believe in.”
The Rev. Canon Dr. Patrick Sookhdeo, the director of the Institute for the Study of Islam and Christianity and a British Anglican, applauded the effort of the Muslim leaders in reaching out to Christian leaders to try to find common ground but he called the Christian response a “betrayal” and “sellout” of the Christian faith.
Following such criticism, Wheaton’s Litfin realized he “moved too quickly” to sign the statement in his eagerness to support its strengths, including peace-making.
Recognizing that the statement could have been written differently to avoid vagueness of the Christian faith, Litfin said he could not support a statement that speaks as if Quran’s Allah and the God of Christians are the same.
“I needed to back away,” he said regarding his retraction.
At the same time, he said he does not criticize others “who do not share these qualms.”
Noting that he was not pressured to withdraw his name from the statement, Litfin said, “It was simply a matter of conscience, combined with the fact that I had put the College on the line in a way I was no longer comfortable in defending.”
Other signers of the Christian letter showed no qualms about their endorsement.
“I still agree [with the statement]. I don’t have reservations,” said Roy Oksnevad, director of Muslim Ministries at Wheaton College’s Billy Graham Center, according to The Record.
[…] for interfaith dialogue that would build relations and reshape the Christian and Islam communities. Click here to read this entire article from the Christian Post. This article or excerpt was posted on February 10, 2008@ 1:19 am . From: Category: * Global […]
I interacted with a Muslim for some time, in person and also through e-mail. I met him on the street at a university. He had told me that he was searching for truth and was considering Christianity. After a number of months of prayerfuly trying to convice him of the diety of Jesus Christ, and other issues, we came to an impass. Every point that I made, he rejected. He also tried to tell me that his Allah and the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob were the same God. This interaction between us prompted me to look very closely at foundations of what I believe. There is just no way that both faiths can extrapolate backwards to common ground. I eventually told him that there was only one possible source for his “holy book”, and that it wasn’t God. That was the end of our dialogue. All that we can do in situations like this is to expose them to the Word and let the Holy Spirit do the work. Dave in Ontario, Canada
Love of God? God who? Muslims say: “Come to common terms [a common word] as between us and you: That we worship none but Allah; that we associate no partners with him…”
“we associate no partners with him”? Aren’t we forgetting Jesus Christ and the Holy Spirit?
I think it’s pretty clear Muslims and Christians will “come to common terms…” when Christians renounce their faith (John 14:6 “I (Jesus) am the way, the truth and the life.”) and become Muslims.
Furthermore, the Muslim expression in the recent “A common World (as opposed to the earlier “Word”) between us and you of “love of God and love of neighbor,” is curious since Israel is a neighbor to Muslims who have announced Allah’s express orders to annihilate it and who are making every attempt to do so. And have we forgotten the “love of neighbor” expressed in 9/11?
I do not appreciate New Age “Christians” such as Rick Warren and Brian McClaren speaking for me, and consider myself a Bible-inerrant follower of Jesus Christ and Him crucified; He Who has absolutely nothing in common with Allah.
Therefore I am deeply appreciative of those of Wheaton College who withdrew their names from “Common Word” and even more of those who refused to sign in the first place.
I believe some muslims have a genuine search for God that takes place during Ramadan or such places, they miss the mark, becuz of their clerics and their beliefs that are taught them. They respect Jesus and say he is a prophet, but they lack the courage to say He is the WAY, the TRUTH and the LIFE, no MAN (woman or child) can come to the Father but by ME! Mohammed nor can a figment of men’s imagination(Allah) give men the LIFE that Jesus speaks of! Paul spoke of vain imgainations and the greeks had many vain imaginary things as do Mormons, and even Catholics do by imagining the deity of Mary, she cannot be divine, becuz ALL flesh is as grass says Peter and that doctrine totally opposed the truth written in divinely inspired scripture! There are too many truths of what we even observe to suggest that Mary had a supernatural nature and it would take great imagination to devise deity for her!
I would have to say that those fellows that signed that document, signed it for themselves and not the churches they may try and represent!
As someone has said, “The road to heaven is paved, asphalted-in my interpretation-with good(noble) intentions”
I think the saying goes:
“The road to Hell is pavedwith good intentions”